Trending

Trending News

Rivers State Executive Stands Firm: A Measured Response to Impeachment Threats

18th March, 2025 at 07:13
By Our Reporter

 

The executive branch of the Rivers State government, led by Governor Siminalayi Fubara, has responded with a measured yet firm stance to the recent initiation of impeachment proceedings by the Rivers

...

 

The executive branch of the Rivers State government, led by Governor Siminalayi Fubara, has responded with a measured yet firm stance to the recent initiation of impeachment proceedings by the Rivers State House of Assembly. On March 18, 2025, as tensions escalated following the Assembly's issuance of a notice of gross misconduct against Fubara and his deputy, Professor Ngozi Odu, the state government swiftly dismissed claims that the governor had been formally served with an impeachment notice. The Rivers State Commissioner for Information and Communication, Barrister Joseph Johnson, emphasized that no official communication had been received from the Assembly, casting doubt on the procedural legitimacy of the lawmakers' actions. This response suggests an attempt by the executive to challenge the validity of the process from the outset, potentially setting the stage for a legal or political counteroffensive.
The executive's reaction reflects a broader strategy of de-escalation and resilience amid a politically charged atmosphere. The government has publicly called on the Assembly, particularly the faction loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, to reconsider its actions in light of their implications for the state's stability. This appeal highlights the executive's awareness of the potential consequences of a collapsed peace process, especially given the backdrop of a protracted political feud between Fubara and Wike. Rather than reacting with overt confrontation, the executive has positioned itself as a stabilizing force, urging dialogue and adherence to constitutional norms.
Furthermore, the Rivers State government has framed the impeachment moves as a distraction from its mandate to govern effectively. By emphasizing that no formal notice was addressed to the governor, the executive appears to be leveraging procedural technicalities to undermine the Assembly's efforts, possibly preparing to seek judicial intervention if the situation escalates. This approach aligns with legal opinions circulating among senior practitioners, who have suggested that Fubara could challenge the process in court if he perceives a threat to his constitutional rights. Overall, the executive's reaction blends defiance with caution, aiming to maintain governance continuity while navigating the complex political dynamics at play in Rivers State.

 

Raye's Rebellion: A Nigerian Youth Corper’s Stand Against Tinubu Sparks National Debate

16th March, 2025 at 20:38
By Our Reporter

As of March 16, 2025, a notable incident involving a National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member criticizing the Nigerian President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has garnered significant attention. This case cen

...

As of March 16, 2025, a notable incident involving a National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member criticizing the Nigerian President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has garnered significant attention. This case centers around a corps member named Raye, from Cross River State, who posted a viral TikTok video under the handle 

@talktoraye
. In the video, she expressed frustration over Nigeria's economic hardships and directly called President Tinubu a "terrible" leader, sparking a mix of support and backlash, as well as an apparent response from NYSC officials.
Background of the Incident
Raye, serving her mandatory NYSC year in Lagos State, uploaded the video less than 24 hours before she reported receiving calls from NYSC officials. In her initial post, she tearfully detailed the financial struggles faced by corps members and ordinary Nigerians, attributing these woes to the government's failure to address inflation and the rising cost of living. She specifically criticized the inadequacy of the NYSC monthly allowance, which she claimed was insufficient to cover transportation and basic needs, especially in a city like Lagos where she also complained about the pervasive "smell." Her exact words included, "I don’t know if there is any other president that is as terrible as you, but you are such a terrible president," and she later doubled down, saying, "Tinubu, you are a terrible person. What are you doing to help our economy?"
Reaction from NYSC and Threats
Following the video's circulation, Raye shared a follow-up clip revealing that NYSC officials had contacted her, urging her to delete the post and cease criticizing the government. She claimed one official called her "stupid" and threatened repercussions, noting that the NYSC had her home address. Raye expressed fear for her safety, stating, "In case anything happens, people will be very much aware of where the problem started from." She argued that labeling Tinubu as "terrible" was not an insult but a "statement of fact" based on her lived experience, highlighting her dwindling bank account and growing depression amid economic challenges. This response from NYSC officials raised concerns about freedom of expression for corps members and whether the organization was attempting to suppress dissent.
Public and Activist Response
The incident triggered widespread reactions across Nigeria. Human rights activist and publisher of Sahara Reporters, Omoyele Sowore, rallied support for Raye, posting on X on March 16, 2025, "This youth CORP member, Raye, is from Cross River. She made these videos to speak up about the economic hardship facing Nigerians, and NYSC officials are now trying to shut her down. #IstandWithRaye #RevolutionNow." He further defended her stance, asserting, "Saying that [Tinubu] is a terrible person / 'president' is not an insult; it is a statement of fact," while criticizing the NYSC as an outdated and corrupt institution. Sowore’s intervention amplified the case, turning it into a broader discussion about governance, youth rights, and the role of the NYSC.
Many Nigerians online echoed Raye’s frustrations, with some arguing that her critique reflected a shared sentiment about the Tinubu administration’s handling of the economy since he took office on May 29, 2023. Others questioned whether corps members, as participants in a government-run program, should face restrictions on free speech. The hashtag #IstandWithRaye began trending, signaling solidarity from those who saw her as a voice for the struggling youth.
Context of Tinubu’s Presidency
Bola Tinubu’s presidency has been marked by controversial decisions, such as the removal of fuel subsidies in May 2023, which led to a sharp increase in fuel prices and living costs. This policy, while praised by some economists and the World Bank as a necessary reform, has fueled public discontent, with the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) organizing strikes in response. Raye’s outburst came against this backdrop, reflecting the economic strain felt by many, including NYSC corps members who receive a modest stipend—currently ?33,000 monthly (approximately $20 USD at current exchange rates)—unchanged despite inflation.
Broader Implications
This incident is not isolated. Nigeria has seen previous cases of citizens facing repercussions for criticizing leaders. In 2020, a 70-year-old man, Bala Izala, was jailed in Katsina State for allegedly insulting then-President Muhammadu Buhari and Governor Aminu Masari, though he was later freed after public outcry and a fine was paid. Raye’s situation, however, highlights a specific tension within the NYSC, an institution established in 1973 under General Yakubu Gowon to foster national unity post-civil war. Critics argue that the program, while symbolically important, has become a burden for youths, exposing them to economic hardship and insecurity without adequate support.
Raye’s case also reignites debates about the NYSC’s relevance. Some, like Hon. Awaji-Inombek Abiante, who sponsored a bill in 2021 to scrap the scheme, cite insecurity and economic futility as reasons to end it. Raye’s experience—feeling stifled and threatened for speaking out—adds fuel to this argument, suggesting the program may no longer align with the needs or rights of modern Nigerian youth.
Outcome and Ongoing Discussion
As of March 16, 2025, there’s no public confirmation of formal disciplinary action against Raye, though her claims of threats suggest internal pressure from the NYSC. The organization has not issued an official statement, leaving the situation unresolved. Meanwhile, her video has sparked a national conversation about youth agency, government accountability, and the limits of free expression in Nigeria. Whether Raye faces further consequences or emerges as a symbol of resistance remains to be seen, but her story underscores the growing frustration among young Nigerians in a challenging socio-economic climate.

Abu Khadijah, Head of ISIS Terrorist Group, Killed in U.S.-Iraqi Airstrike

15th March, 2025 at 21:50
By Our Reporter

 

On March 15, 2025, significant developments emerged regarding the leadership of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group. Abdallah Makki Muslih al-Rifai, widely known by his alias "Abu Khadijah," who

...

 

On March 15, 2025, significant developments emerged regarding the leadership of the Islamic State (ISIS) terrorist group. Abdallah Makki Muslih al-Rifai, widely known by his alias "Abu Khadijah," who served as a prominent leader within ISIS, was killed in a precision airstrike conducted by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces in coordination with Iraqi security forces. The operation took place on March 13, 2025, in Al Anbar Province, Iraq, marking a major blow to the extremist organization.
Who Was Abu Khadijah?
Abu Khadijah held a critical position within ISIS, overseeing the group’s global operations, logistics, and planning. He was also instrumental in directing a significant portion of the organization’s international financing. Described by Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani as "one of the most dangerous terrorists in Iraq and the world," Abu Khadijah was a key figure in the group’s hierarchy. Reports indicate he served as the "deputy caliph" and was responsible for ISIS operations in Iraq and Syria, as well as external operations targeting regions like Turkey and the broader Levant.
His importance within ISIS was further underscored by U.S. military officials, with General Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of CENTCOM, stating, "Abu Khadijah was one of the most important ISIS members in the entire global ISIS organization." His death is seen as a significant disruption to the group's leadership and operational capabilities.
Details of the Operation
The airstrike occurred on Thursday, March 13, 2025, targeting Abu Khadijah and another ISIS operative in western Iraq. Following the strike, CENTCOM and Iraqi forces secured the site, where they found the two terrorists dead, still wearing unexploded suicide vests and armed with multiple weapons. Abu Khadijah’s identity was confirmed through DNA evidence, which had been collected during a previous raid he narrowly escaped.
U.S. President Donald Trump announced the operation’s success on his Truth Social platform, declaring, "Today the fugitive leader of ISIS in Iraq was killed. He was relentlessly hunted down by our intrepid warfighters." Trump emphasized the collaborative effort, noting coordination with the Iraqi government and the Kurdish Regional Government, and framed the operation as a demonstration of "PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH."
Impact on ISIS
The killing of Abu Khadijah is the latest in a series of leadership losses for ISIS, which has struggled to maintain stability since the death of its former leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, in 2019. As the emir of ISIS’s Delegated Committee—one of the group’s top decision-making bodies—Abu Khadijah played a pivotal role in sustaining its global network. His elimination is expected to hinder the group’s ability to coordinate attacks and manage finances, though experts caution that ISIS remains a persistent threat through its affiliates and decentralized cells across the Middle East and beyond.
Broader Context
The operation coincided with diplomatic efforts in the region, including a visit by Syria’s interim Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani to Iraq on March 14, 2025. During the visit, both nations pledged to enhance cooperation in combating ISIS remnants, particularly along their shared border. This development reflects ongoing concerns about the group’s potential resurgence amid regional instability.
As of March 15, 2025, the death of Abu Khadijah stands as a significant victory for counterterrorism efforts, though the long-term impact on ISIS’s operational strength remains to be seen. The U.S. and its allies have vowed to continue targeting the group to prevent it from reconstituting its forces and threatening global security.

 

"Uncertain Siege: The Contested Encirclement of Ukrainian Forces in Kursk"

15th March, 2025 at 06:00
By Our Reporter

As of March 15, 2025, the situation regarding whether Ukrainian soldiers have been encircled by Russian troops, particularly in the Kursk region, remains contested and unclear based on available inf

...

As of March 15, 2025, the situation regarding whether Ukrainian soldiers have been encircled by Russian troops, particularly in the Kursk region, remains contested and unclear based on available information. There are conflicting reports from various sources, and no definitive consensus has emerged.
On one hand, some reports suggest that Ukrainian forces in Russia’s Kursk region, where they launched a surprise incursion in August 2024, are facing significant pressure from Russian counteroffensives. Russian officials, including President Vladimir Putin, have claimed that Ukrainian troops are encircled or nearly surrounded, with Putin stating on March 13, 2025, that the situation in Kursk was "completely under our control" and that Ukrainian soldiers were "cut off inside the invasion zone," facing a choice to "surrender or die." Additionally, open-source maps from sources like Deep State, a Ukrainian military blogging resource, indicated on March 7, 2025, that about three-quarters of the Ukrainian force in Kursk was nearly encircled, connected to remaining forces by a narrow corridor that Russian troops were attempting to sever. Reuters and other outlets have reported on Russian advances threatening to cut off Ukrainian supply lines, potentially isolating thousands of troops.
On the other hand, Ukrainian military officials and soldiers on the ground have strongly disputed these claims. The Ukrainian General Staff stated on March 14, 2025, that reports of encirclement in Kursk were "untrue" and "fabricated by the Russians for political purposes and pressure on Ukraine and partners." They emphasized that Ukrainian units had regrouped and withdrawn to more advantageous defensive positions, denying any full operational encirclement. Soldiers like Artem Kariakin, stationed in the region, told POLITICO on March 14, 2025, that while Russian forces were applying pressure, "most of the forces managed to be withdrawn under the threat of the situation," and no strategic encirclement had occurred. Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi also asserted on March 11, 2025, that Moscow’s efforts to cut off Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk had not succeeded, with the border to Ukraine’s Sumy region remaining under Ukrainian control.
Independent analysts and military experts have also cast doubt on the encirclement narrative. Michael Kofman from the Carnegie Endowment described claims of a mass encirclement as "fiction" on March 14, 2025, and some pro-Russian Telegram channels echoed skepticism about visible signs of such an operation. Reports indicate that Ukraine has been conducting a staged withdrawal from Kursk for weeks, though under challenging conditions due to Russian drone and artillery pressure, rather than being fully trapped.
The discrepancy may stem from differing definitions of "encirclement" (operational vs. tactical), propaganda efforts on both sides, or the fluid nature of the battlefield. While Russian forces have made gains and disrupted Ukrainian logistics in Kursk, the evidence does not conclusively support a completed encirclement of Ukrainian troops as of now. The situation remains dynamic, with Ukrainian forces reportedly still able to maneuver, albeit under strain.
In summary, it is not definitively true that Ukrainian soldiers have been fully encircled by Russian troops based on the latest available information. Claims of encirclement appear exaggerated or premature, though Ukrainian forces in Kursk are undoubtedly in a precarious position as Russian pressure mounts.