Home

Home News

Comprehensive Report on the Akpabio/Natasha Controversy: Senate Passes Vote of Confidence on Akpabio

13th March, 2025 at 13:29
By Our Reporter

The ongoing controversy between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has gripped Nigeria’s political landscape, sparking debates about parliamentary decorum, gender

...

The ongoing controversy between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has gripped Nigeria’s political landscape, sparking debates about parliamentary decorum, gender dynamics, and allegations of misconduct. The Nigerian Senate's decision to pass a vote of confidence in Akpabio amid this escalating dispute has further intensified public scrutiny and raised questions about institutional integrity, fairness, and the handling of serious allegations. Below is a detailed report on the controversy and the Senate's response as of March 13, 2025.
Senate’s Response: Vote of Confidence and Disciplinary Action
The Senate addressed the controversy in several plenary sessions, culminating in significant resolutions:
February 25, 2025: Referral to Ethics Committee
Following Natasha’s initial outburst, Senate Spokesperson Senator Yemi Adaramodu raised a point of order, condemning her conduct as a breach of decorum that tarnished the Senate’s image. The Senate unanimously voted to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, chaired by Senator Neda Imasuen, for investigation. The committee was tasked with reporting back within two to three weeks.
Vote of Confidence in Akpabio
On multiple occasions, the Senate rallied behind Akpabio. A notable instance occurred on February 25, 2025, when senators passed a vote of confidence in his leadership, emphasizing their commitment to protecting the institution’s integrity. This was reaffirmed on March 13, 2025, amid the controversy’s peak, signaling unified support for Akpabio despite Natasha’s allegations. Earlier, on October 17, 2024, a similar vote had been passed in response to unrelated impeachment rumors, indicating a pattern of senatorial backing for Akpabio.
March 6, 2025: Natasha’s Suspension
The Ethics Committee dismissed Natasha’s sexual harassment petition against Akpabio on March 5, 2025, labeling it “dead on arrival” due to procedural irregularities. The following day, the committee recommended a six-month suspension for Natasha, citing her earlier disruptive behavior during the seat dispute as "grossly disorderly." Despite some senators advocating for a shorter three-month suspension, the majority upheld the six-month term via a voice vote presided over by Akpabio. The suspension barred Natasha from the National Assembly premises, locked her office, and withheld her salary and aides’ payments, contingent on a formal apology for reconsideration.
Natasha decried the suspension as “unjust,” arguing it violated principles of fairness and natural justice. She vowed to continue serving her constituents outside the Senate chamber until her term ends in 2027.
Public and Political Reactions
The controversy has polarized opinions across Nigeria:
Support for Natasha: Feminist groups, some civil society organizations, and segments of the public hailed Natasha’s courage in confronting alleged abuse of power. Protests in Abuja saw demonstrators chanting “Akpabio must go,” demanding a transparent investigation into her harassment claims. Figures like former Senate President Bukola Saraki called for an unbiased probe to protect the Senate’s integrity, emphasizing the need to avoid perceptions of gender bias or harassment cover-ups.
Support for Akpabio: Akpabio’s defenders, including many senators, argued that Natasha’s actions undermined parliamentary order. They cited examples of other senators (e.g., Adamu Aliero, Aminu Tambuwal) who accepted seat changes without protest, framing her resistance as unwarranted. Critics of Natasha, including some X users, questioned the timing and credibility of her harassment claims, noting the lack of immediate corroboration and her delay in raising them publicly.
Broader Implications: The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) and others expressed concern over the Senate’s deteriorating public image, urging an independent investigation to restore trust. The controversy also reignited debates about women’s participation in Nigerian politics, with only 4 of 109 senators being female—far below the 35% affirmative action target.
Key Issues and Unresolved Questions
Procedural Fairness: Critics argue that Akpabio’s role in presiding over Natasha’s suspension, despite being the accused, represents a conflict of interest. The dismissal of her harassment petition on procedural grounds, without substantive investigation, has fueled perceptions of bias.
Evidence and Credibility: Natasha’s allegations lack concrete evidence beyond her testimony, raising questions about substantiation. Conversely, Akpabio’s camp has not provided a detailed rebuttal, leaving the truth contested.
Institutional Integrity: The Senate’s swift disciplinary action against Natasha, contrasted with its reluctance to probe Akpabio, has led to accusations of prioritizing individual protection over institutional accountability.
Conclusion
As of March 13, 2025, the Akpabio/Natasha controversy remains a flashpoint in Nigerian politics. The Senate’s vote of confidence in Akpabio underscores his entrenched support within the chamber, while Natasha’s suspension and allegations have cast a shadow over its credibility. The lack of an independent investigation into the harassment claims continues to stoke public discontent, with calls for transparency growing louder. Whether this saga will prompt systemic reforms or fade into political noise depends on the actions of the Senate and the resilience of Nigeria’s democratic institutions in addressing such disputes fairly and decisively. For now, the controversy serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing women in politics and the delicate balance between power, procedure, and justice in Nigeria’s legislative sphere.

Hon. Abiola Makinde Presents A Bill at the Federal House of Representatives to Protect Human Rights Defenders

11th March, 2025 at 18:57
By Our Reporter
Nigerian In a significant step toward bolstering human rights protections in Nigeria, the House of Representatives today passed the second reading of the Bill for an Act to Recognize and Enhance the C
...
Nigerian In a significant step toward bolstering human rights protections in Nigeria, the House of Representatives today passed the second reading of the Bill for an Act to Recognize and Enhance the Capacity of the Government of Nigeria to Protect Human Rights Defenders and for Related Matters (HB. 1867). The bill, presented earlier today at plenary by Honorable Abiola Peter Makinde (HAM), aims to establish a robust legal framework to safeguard human rights defenders across the country. Co-sponsored by Honorable Mudashiru Lukman, the legislation reflects Nigeria's growing commitment to aligning with international human rights standards.
Legislative Milestone
The successful second reading of HB. 1867 marks a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s legislative efforts to protect individuals and groups advocating for human rights. Honorable Makinde, in his lead debate on the floor of the House, emphasized the urgent need for a law that recognizes and shields human rights defenders from threats, intimidation, and violence. The bill garnered widespread support from lawmakers across the six geopolitical zones and various political parties, a testament to its broad appeal and perceived importance. Special appreciation was extended to the Right Honorable Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, and members of the House for their backing of this initiative.
Objectives and Key Provisions
The bill seeks to provide a comprehensive legal framework to protect human rights defenders, ensuring they can carry out their work without fear of reprisal. Its primary objectives include:
  • Recognition and Protection: Formally acknowledging human rights defenders and guaranteeing their safety while they advocate for justice and equality.
  • Fundamental Rights: Ensuring defenders have the right to access information, form organizations, receive funding, and communicate freely with both national and international human rights bodies.
  • Obligations of State and Non-State Actors: Mandating both government entities and private organizations to respect and support the work of human rights defenders.
  • Remedies and Enforcement Mechanisms: Establishing clear pathways for redress and accountability in cases of violations against defenders.
By addressing these areas, HB. 1867 aims to create an enabling environment for human rights advocacy, aligning Nigeria with global standards such as those outlined in the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, adopted in 1998.
Context and Significance
Human rights defenders in Nigeria have long faced significant challenges, including harassment, arbitrary arrests, and restrictions on their activities. Previous attempts to regulate civil society, such as the controversial NGO Bill (HB. 585) in 2016, sparked concerns about stifling dissent rather than protecting advocates. Critics of such measures argued that they contradicted Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression and association. In contrast, HB. 1867 represents a shift toward empowerment and protection, drawing inspiration from progressive legislation in countries like Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, and Mali, where national laws safeguarding human rights defenders have been enacted.
The bill’s passage through its second reading underscores Nigeria’s evolving stance on human rights amid ongoing domestic and international scrutiny. Issues such as police brutality, restrictions on freedom of speech, and the treatment of marginalized groups have repeatedly drawn attention to the need for stronger protections. Posts on X today highlighted the bill’s progress, with users expressing optimism about its potential to foster a safer environment for activists, though some cautioned that its success hinges on effective implementation.
Broader Implications
The advancement of HB. 1867 comes at a time when Nigeria is navigating complex socio-political challenges, including economic uncertainty and security concerns. The bill’s emphasis on collaboration between the government and civil society aligns with calls from organizations like the International Service for Human Rights (ISHR), which in 2019 urged Nigeria to secure an enabling environment for defenders. By passing this legislation, Nigeria could set a precedent for other African nations grappling with similar issues.
Next Steps
With the second reading completed, HB. 1867 will now proceed to the committee stage, where it will undergo detailed review and potential amendments before returning to the House for a third reading. If approved, it will then move to the Senate for concurrence and ultimately require presidential assent to become law. Lawmakers and advocates alike are hopeful that the bill will maintain its momentum, with Honorable Makinde and his co-sponsor, Honorable Lukman, pledging to see it through to enactment.
A Unified Call for Support
In a press statement released earlier today, Honorable Makinde expressed gratitude to his colleagues for their bipartisan support, noting that the bill’s success reflects a collective commitment to upholding fundamental freedoms. “This is a victory for every Nigerian who believes in justice and equality,” he said. “We are sending a clear message that human rights defenders are not alone—they have the backing of the law and the people.”
As Nigeria awaits the next phase of this legislative journey, HB. 1867 stands as a beacon of hope for those on the frontlines of human rights advocacy, promising a future where their voices can be raised without fear.

Supreme Court Dismisses PDP’s Appeal, Upholds Lucky Aiyedatiwa as Ondo State Governor

11th March, 2025 at 14:49
By Our Reporter

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has dismissed an appeal filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate, Agboola Ajayi, challenging the election of Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa as

...

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has dismissed an appeal filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate, Agboola Ajayi, challenging the election of Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa as the legitimate governor of Ondo State. In a unanimous decision delivered on Tuesday, the apex court described the appeal as "baseless, frivolous, and lacking in merit," effectively putting an end to the legal battle over the governorship election.

The lead judgment, delivered by Justice Garba Lawal, upheld the earlier rulings of the Ondo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal and the Court of Appeal, both of which had affirmed Aiyedatiwa’s victory in the election held on November 16, 2024. The Supreme Court’s decision marks the final judicial pronouncement on the matter, solidifying Aiyedatiwa’s position as the duly elected governor of Ondo State.

Background of the Case

The legal dispute arose following the Ondo State governorship election, in which Lucky Aiyedatiwa, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), emerged victorious. Agboola Ajayi, representing the PDP, contested the outcome, alleging electoral irregularities, including voter intimidation, manipulation of results, and non-compliance with electoral laws. The PDP and Ajayi subsequently filed a petition at the Ondo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal, seeking to nullify Aiyedatiwa’s victory and declare Ajayi the rightful winner.

The tribunal, after reviewing evidence and arguments from both sides, dismissed the petition, ruling that the PDP and Ajayi failed to substantiate their claims with credible evidence. Dissatisfied with the tribunal’s decision, the petitioners appealed to the Court of Appeal, which also upheld Aiyedatiwa’s election in a judgment delivered earlier this year. The PDP and Ajayi then escalated the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower courts erred in their rulings.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

In its judgment, the Supreme Court found no compelling reason to overturn the decisions of the tribunal and the Court of Appeal. Justice Garba Lawal, who read the lead judgment, emphasized that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their allegations of electoral malpractice. The court noted that the burden of proof rested on the PDP and Ajayi, and they did not meet the legal threshold required to challenge the election results.

“The appeal is devoid of merit,” Justice Lawal stated. “The appellants have not demonstrated any miscarriage of justice or violation of electoral laws that would warrant the nullification of the respondent’s election. This court will not entertain frivolous claims aimed at undermining the democratic process.”

The apex court also criticized the petitioners for what it described as an attempt to waste judicial time with unsubstantiated allegations. The dismissal of the appeal was unanimous, with all justices on the panel concurring with the lead judgment.

Reactions to the Verdict

Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, in a statement issued shortly after the ruling, described the Supreme Court’s decision as a "triumph of democracy and the will of the people of Ondo State." He expressed gratitude to the judiciary for upholding justice and urged residents of the state to support his administration’s efforts to deliver good governance.

“This victory is not just for me or the APC, but for every citizen of Ondo State who believes in the power of their vote,” Aiyedatiwa said. “I call on all political actors to put aside partisan differences and join hands with me to move our state forward.”

On the other hand, the PDP and Agboola Ajayi expressed disappointment with the ruling. In a press conference held in Akure, Ajayi maintained that the election was marred by irregularities and vowed to continue advocating for electoral reforms in Nigeria. “While we respect the Supreme Court’s decision, we remain convinced that the voices of the people were suppressed during the election,” he said. The PDP leadership has yet to issue an official statement on its next steps.

Implications of the Ruling

The Supreme Court’s decision brings closure to months of legal uncertainty in Ondo State, allowing Governor Aiyedatiwa to focus on governance without the distraction of ongoing litigation. Aiyedatiwa, who assumed office following the death of his predecessor, Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, in December 2023, has promised to prioritize infrastructure development, healthcare, and education in the state.

Political analysts view the ruling as a significant boost for the APC in the South-West region, reinforcing the party’s dominance in Ondo State. However, it also highlights ongoing debates about the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process, with opposition parties frequently raising concerns about transparency and fairness in elections.

Conclusion

With the Supreme Court’s verdict, the chapter on the 2020 Ondo State governorship election dispute is officially closed. As of March 11, 2025, Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa remains the constitutionally recognized leader of Ondo State, tasked with steering the state toward progress amid high expectations from its citizens. The ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s pivotal role in Nigeria’s democracy, even as calls for electoral reform continue to echo across the political landscape.

Breaking News: Nasir El-Rufai Resigns From APC

10th March, 2025 at 17:18
By Our Reporter

Nasir El-Rufai’s resignation from the All Progressives Congress (APC) on March 10, 2025, marks a significant shift in Nigeria’s political landscape, reflecting both personal disillusionment and broa

...

Nasir El-Rufai’s resignation from the All Progressives Congress (APC) on March 10, 2025, marks a significant shift in Nigeria’s political landscape, reflecting both personal disillusionment and broader tensions within the ruling party. As a former Governor of Kaduna State and a founding member of the APC, El-Rufai played a pivotal role in the party’s formation in 2013 and its electoral successes in 2015, 2019, and 2023. His departure, followed by his decision to join the Social Democratic Party (SDP), underscores a growing rift between his progressive ideals and the current trajectory of the APC under President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
El-Rufai’s decision appears to stem from a combination of personal grievances and ideological discontent. In his resignation statement, he expressed frustration with the APC’s leadership, accusing it of abandoning the progressive values that originally defined the party. He highlighted the lack of internal democracy, noting that party organs like the National Executive Committee (NEC) and caucus had not met in over two years, rendering the APC a "one-man show" or even a "zero-man show." This criticism aligns with earlier remarks he made in January 2025, where he stated he no longer recognized the APC and questioned its commitment to addressing Nigeria’s challenges. His sense of betrayal was further compounded by what he perceived as shabby treatment from the party, despite his significant contributions to its victories. Notably, his failure to secure a ministerial position in 2023, after being rejected by the Senate amid unclear security concerns, seems to have deepened his alienation.
The timing of his exit also suggests strategic intent. By joining the SDP and immediately calling for opposition unity to challenge the APC in the 2027 elections, El-Rufai is positioning himself as a key figure in a potential coalition against Tinubu’s government. His move has been welcomed by SDP leaders like Adewole Adebayo, the party’s 2023 presidential candidate, who praised El-Rufai’s experience and framed his defection as a step toward rescuing Nigeria from poor governance. This aligns with reports of El-Rufai’s recent engagements with opposition figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, hinting at broader plans to consolidate opposition forces.
Reactions to his resignation have been mixed. Critics like Daniel Bwala, a Tinubu aide, dismissed it as an "inordinate ambition destined to fail," accusing El-Rufai of aligning with "sore losers" to unseat the incumbent. Meanwhile, allies and supporters view it as a principled stand against a party that has drifted from its founding ethos. Political analysts see it as a blow to the APC’s cohesion, potentially triggering further defections as dissatisfaction grows within its ranks.
El-Rufai’s tenure as Kaduna governor was marked by bold reforms in education, healthcare, and infrastructure, but also by controversy, including accusations of authoritarianism and silencing dissent—ironic given his current critique of the APC’s leadership style. His departure raises questions about the APC’s ability to retain its influential figures and maintain unity ahead of 2027, while his pivot to the SDP could reinvigorate opposition politics if he successfully rallies other disillusioned leaders. However, whether this gamble pays off will depend on his ability to navigate Nigeria’s complex political terrain and overcome the APC’s entrenched power. For now, El-Rufai’s resignation is both a personal reckoning and a calculated move with far-reaching implications.